# 网关性能测试 > 注意:记得关闭限流功能 **测试环境** - 测试工具:[wrk](https://github.com/wg/wrk),[安装教程](https://www.cnblogs.com/quanxiaoha/p/10661650.html) - 服务器:CentOS7(虚拟机,宿主机:macbookpro),内存:2G,CPU:1,核数:2核 - 运行环境:Java8、Mysql-5.7、Nacos-1.1.3 - 网关启动参数: ``` -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -Xloggc:gc-zuul.log \ -XX:MetaspaceSize=128m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -Xmn512m -Xss256k -XX:SurvivorRatio=8 \ -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC ``` - zuul配置(仅针对zuul,Spring Cloud Gateway没有做优化配置): ```properties # 不校验时间,这样一个链接可以一直进行测试 sop.api-config.timeout-seconds=0 sop.restful.enable=true logging.level.com.gitee=info # zuul调优 zuul.host.max-per-route-connections=5000 zuul.host.max-total-connections=5000 zuul.semaphore.max-semaphores=5000 ribbon.ReadTimeout=5000 hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.thread.timeoutInMilliseconds=13000 logging.file=sop-gateway.log ``` CentOS允许最大连接数 ``` $ ulimit -n 65535 ``` ## 调用开放接口 - wrk命令: ``` wrk -t8 -c200 -d30s "http://10.1.31.227:8081/?charset=utf-8&biz_content=%7B%22name%22%3A%22%E8%91%AB%E8%8A%A6%E5%A8%83%22%2C%22id%22%3A%221%22%7D&method=alipay.story.get&format=json&sign=RjK%2FThnzAJQOw%2BfoVLS18PgWZAR%2B25SI2XdONFhS%2BmS8vsv2jNT3rygFoh%2ByX1AJbMgIEfcBzkQyqrs29jjd5dcwHVkcf7vxXshyfcEgl0fbMF6Ihycnz7rqSqkW3lzAWx4NuWUfkPnTX8Ffuf%2BhYRaI0NCpNv%2FV300HvsvmUjS6ZzS4YHaT1peSq0agfUhwRPd97aYMnUwRZDzxNfc5wuXA7OQ1o%2FPYIuIb%2FajVfwNP5ysitc%2FKtYEqt9rNAuzkcFmsw71d2RRnrPLsDN%2BuBXnIEh482f%2FbMj2Rj4%2FMq%2B0PEtlTRbg3rYnxyfowymfX%2BNmI4gNRUt70D4a%2FL3Qiug%3D%3D&app_id=2019032617262200001&sign_type=RSA2&version=1.0×tamp=2020-01-19+13%3A34%3A12" ``` - Spring Cloud Gateway测试结果 ``` 8 threads and 200 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 139.74ms 69.39ms 617.14ms 69.82% Req/Sec 182.12 55.74 343.00 66.24% 43391 requests in 30.09s, 11.96MB read Requests/sec: 1441.96 Transfer/sec: 406.96KB ``` 结果说明,下同: ``` 8 threads and 200 connections (共8个测试线程,200个连接) (平均值) (标准差) (最大值)(正负一个标准差所占比例) Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev (延迟) Latency 139.74ms 69.39ms 617.14ms 69.82% (每秒请求数) Req/Sec 182.12 55.74 343.00 66.24% 43391 requests in 30.09s, 11.96MB read (30.09秒内处理了43391个请求,耗费流量11.96MB) Requests/sec: 1441.96 (QPS 1441.96,即平均每秒处理请求数为1441.96) Transfer/sec: 406.96KB (平均每秒流量406.96KB) ``` - Spring Cloud Zuul测试结果 ``` 8 threads and 200 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 230.14ms 331.27ms 2.00s 86.98% Req/Sec 141.69 51.04 323.00 66.99% 33945 requests in 30.09s, 9.88MB read Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 385 Requests/sec: 1128.05 Transfer/sec: 336.15KB ``` ## 调用restful请求 - wrk命令: ``` wrk -t8 -c200 -d30s "http://10.1.31.227:8081/rest/story-service/food/getFoodById?id=2" ``` 线程数为 8,模拟 200 个并发请求,持续 30 秒 - Spring Cloud Gateway测试结果 ``` 8 threads and 200 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 120.14ms 58.30ms 513.85ms 67.47% Req/Sec 210.47 54.26 770.00 69.37% 50301 requests in 30.10s, 7.53MB read Requests/sec: 1670.97 Transfer/sec: 256.21KB ``` - Spring Cloud Zuul测试结果 ``` 8 threads and 200 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 185.86ms 285.65ms 1.99s 88.55% Req/Sec 167.75 55.60 460.00 68.05% 40070 requests in 30.09s, 6.65MB read Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 466 Requests/sec: 1331.81 Transfer/sec: 226.50KB ``` 综上所述,Spring Cloud Gateway在没有优化的情况下,压测表现比zuul好,但zuul的数据表现也不差,但是出现超时现象,总的来说还是Spring Cloud Gateway具有优势。 附启动脚本: `restart.sh` ```bash echo "Stopping sop-gateway-4.2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar" pid=`ps -ef | grep sop-gateway-4.2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'` if [ -n "$pid" ] then echo "kill -9 的id:" $pid kill -9 $pid fi nohup java -jar -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -Xloggc:gc.log \ -XX:MetaspaceSize=128m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -Xmn256m -Xss256k -XX:SurvivorRatio=8\ -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC sop-gateway-4.2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar\ --spring.profiles.active=dev --server.port=8081 & tail -f nohup.out ```